Leeds United has been instructed to pay a fine of £40,000, with £20,000 of this amount being deferred until the end of the upcoming season. This ruling stems from an event that occurred at Elland Road, where a supporter confronted Newcastle United manager Eddie Howe in the away technical area during a Premier League match. In a previous incident, David Derbyshire received a 12-week prison sentence for assaulting someone during a Leeds vs. Newcastle match in May of the same year. As a result of this incident, Leeds has been penalized £40,000 by an Independent Regulatory Commission. Half of this fine will only be imposed if the club violates regulation E21 (or its equivalent) concerning spectator misconduct at football matches before the end of the 2024/25 season.
Leeds United admitted their failure to ensure that their spectators, supporters, and those claiming to be supporters behaved in an orderly manner, refraining from using inappropriate, offensive, violent, threatening, abusive, insulting, or provocative language or behavior. The Football Association (FA) made a case for a more severe penalty, but the Commission determined that Leeds’ culpability in the incident was low and considered mitigating factors. The club promptly accepted the charge, cooperated with the FA, expressed remorse for the incident, and issued an apology.
The Commission acknowledged that Leeds had an excellent and detailed security plan, with one small area of vulnerability exploited by a lone individual with unclear motivations for entering the technical area. The CCTV system at Elland Road was unable to identify the point of entry for Derbyshire into the away dugout’s technical area, which influenced the punishment meted out to Leeds.
The FA raised concerns about the club’s inability to determine the spectator’s entry point onto the field of play, implying a significant risk of future incursions from the West Stand. They criticized the inadequacy of the club’s CCTV system, given their Premier League status and a stadium capacity of 37,000. It was revealed that there were only two cameras covering the West Stand, and the most vulnerable area, the technical area where coaching staff and match officials were located, was not adequately covered. The gaps in CCTV coverage rendered the control room ineffective in detecting the spectator’s entry, which was a significant safety concern.
The FA also suggested that this incident could be categorized as ‘gross negligence’ (category 3) or ‘negligence simpliciter’ (category 4).
Leeds argued that they intended to upgrade their current CCTV system but were hindered by financial constraints resulting from relegation from the Premier League. The club received a warning regarding their future conduct. They responded promptly to the incident by issuing a lifetime ban to Derbyshire after his apprehension by the West Yorkshire Police.
Leeds retains the right to appeal the Commission’s decision according to Disciplinary Regulations.
Leave a Reply