Sir Jim Ratcliffe recently offered his thoughts on Manchester United’s desire to sign Dan Ashworth away from Newcastle in an interview.
As of my last knowledge update in January 2022, I don’t have information on the specific events or negotiations mentioned regarding Dan Ashworth, Eddie Howe, Jim Ratcliffe, and Manchester United. It’s important to note that my information might be outdated, and developments in the world of sports can change rapidly.
To get the latest and most accurate information on this matter, I recommend checking the latest sports news from reliable sources or the official statements from the involved parties. Sports news websites, official club announcements, or reputable journalists covering football news can provide up-to-date information on the situation.
Ratcliffe described Ashworth’s potential two-year unemployment as “silly” and “absurd” in a recent interview. However, Newcastle’s position has only been more adamant since, and they will do all in their power to prevent a Premier League opponent from stealing a pivotal player.
Thank you for providing the additional context. It seems that Eddie Howe is avoiding commenting on Jim Ratcliffe’s remarks and is emphasizing the focus on Newcastle’s perspective in these situations. The statement suggests that the events of the week have brought certainty, allowing them to look toward the future. Howe also mentions that he is not directly involved in the discussions and is concentrating on preparing the team for the upcoming match against Arsenal.
Regarding the negotiations between Manchester United and Newcastle for Dan Ashworth, it’s mentioned that Manchester United is unwilling to meet the £20 million price tag set by Newcastle. The report also suggests that Manchester United is patient and willing to wait to secure their priority target.
For the latest updates on this situation, I recommend checking reputable sports news sources or official statements from the involved clubs. Negotiations and developments in the world of football can evolve quickly.